Is the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?

Puff Bar is a wonderful alternative to a normal ice cream treat because it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is manufactured with only natural flavors, so it’s a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. In addition to that, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it as often as you want without needing to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s great for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.

Puff Bar is podsmall.com a relatively new product, which was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we are exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.

One of the biggest issues in public health today is obesity and diet. Because of this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that people who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so if they only need to carry around the small product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.

By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In line with the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert that allows one to put it into your mouth, this means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you may go. If the product also offers an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of the law. The reason being that while there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to use to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke a different one.

Because the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. Along with sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.

What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could start a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco in to the marketplace.

And also the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes on the market could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research suggests that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to younger generations, this could substantially reduce the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to search out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative that may not provide them with nicotine.

It seems that the UK government may have a point. There is currently no requirement for tobacco companies to add warning labels on the products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It looks a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem such as a much better way to make money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which means that fewer people will purchase them.